. . . . Click here for Announcement of new lawsuit This lawsuit was dismissed by the judge because the Bank of America attorney did not tell me that he had filed some kind of motion, which required me to be at court. Therefore, the judge dismissed the case. However, some of the tabs above [...]
+Continue Reading. . . Put mouse below to pause speech. BofA Secret Seminar Recordings Admitting HAMP Does Not Exist . Posted on September 3rd, 2010 The Youtube below is from an alleged BofA training seminar in October 2009. This recording clearly suggests that Bank of Blaming America was blaming the Obama administration for Bank of America’s poor performance [...]
+Continue Reading. . . . California prohibits telephone monitoring or recording, including the use of information obtained through interception unless all parties to the conversation consent (California Penal Code Sections 631 & 632). There is no statutory business telephone exception and the relevant case law all but excludes this possibility. California courts have recognized “implied” consent [...]
+Continue Reading. . . . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems to [...]
+Continue Reading. . . . . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems [...]
+Continue Reading. . . . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems to [...]
+Continue Reading. . . . The following are letters that I received during the modification process from Bank of America. You will see that Bank of Defrauding America contradicts itself between the letter dated Nov. 13, 2009 and the letter dated on January 23, 2010. It appeared that BofA wanted to cause delay, while stating that they had not [...]
+Continue Reading
