Nationalmortgageinvestigation.com . .. .. Click here for Announcement of new lawsuit This lawsuit was dismissed by the judge because the Bank of America attorney did not tell me that he had filed some kind of motion, which required me to be at court. Therefore, the judge dismissed the case. However, some of the [...]
+Continue ReadingNationalmortgageinvestigation.com . .. .. . California prohibits telephone monitoring or recording, including the use of information obtained through interception unless all parties to the conversation consent (California Penal Code Sections 631 & 632). There is no statutory business telephone exception and the relevant case law all but excludes this possibility. California courts have recognized “implied” [...]
+Continue ReadingNationalmortgageinvestigation.com . .. … . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems [...]
+Continue ReadingNationalmortgageinvestigation.com . .. .. . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems [...]
+Continue ReadingNationalmortgageinvestigation.com . .. .. . The question in the Wright Vs. Bank of America case might not be about Bank of America metaphorically having the right to own the car, but might be more about if Bank of Abusing America has the right to run over, hit and abuse John Wright with the car. The Federal Court Judge seems [...]
+Continue Reading
Video Broadcast