See Bullshit Meter On Mitchell J. Stein’s Civil Rights Lawsuit Filed Against Kamala D. Harris
. 
.
.
.
.
.
You may pause intro music below
Pause music by putting mouse below.
Mitchell J. Stein files Civil Rights Lawsuit Against California’s Most Beloved
Attorney General
.
May 10th, 2012
Written by John Wright
California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris has proven to become somewhat of a Rock Star here in California when it comes to trying to protect the California homeowner. This is because Madam Attorney General would not only stun the banks – but also many Californians around the state when she made a statement by “walking out of the 50 State Settlement Talks” in September 30th, 2011. This would then be followed up by her announcing “The Mortgage Investigation Alliance” that she would be forming with Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto on December 6th, 2011 to investigate the banks potentially irregular, fraudulent, illegal and simply unsafe mortgage practices. The Attorney General of California then would introduce what has become known to Californians as “The Homeowner Bill of Rights” on April 29th, 2012 — but only to receive much unexpected opposition from the Democrat controlled Banking and Finance Committee on April 19th, 2012.
..
Democrats delay California mortgage overhaul amid business opposition
.
Cross linked with sacbee.com
April 19th, 2012
By Jon Ortiz jortiz@sacbee.com
Amid raucous boos and hisses from a packed hearing room gallery, an Assembly committee on Monday suddenly pulled two mortgage reform bills sponsored by Attorney General Kamala Harris – just before she was supposed to testify.
The unexpected turn of events in the Democratic-controlled Banking and Finance Committee turned what Harris hoped would be a slam-dunk hearing into a signal that her “Homeowner Bill of Rights” is in trouble.
The banking and mortgage industries strongly oppose the bills, intended to clean up lending and foreclosure industry abuses. The California Chamber of Commerce has put them on its hit list of “job killer” legislation. “We’re concerned about these bills because we believe that they’ll stall economic development in the state,” said Cal Chamber lobbyist Marti Fisher.
The measures pulled by committee Chairman Mike Eng, D-Monterey Park, would apply to California lenders the terms of consumer protectionsrecently accepted by five major banks to settle a high-profile lawsuit by Harris and other state attorneys general.
The $25 billion settlement reached several weeks ago with Ally Financial, Bank of America, Chase, Citi and Wells Fargo expires in three years. Harris’ bills would apply the stricter rules indefinitely to all mortgage companies doing business in California.
One of the measures pulled Monday, Assembly Bill 1602, would give borrowers more legal recourse than they have now. It would 
also prohibit lenders from foreclosing on a property and negotiating a loan modification on the property at the same time.
“That happens a lot,” said Sacramento bankruptcy attorney Barry Spitzer. “I get people in my office all the time afraid of foreclosure even though they’re working on a loan modification.”
The committee also pulled back Assembly Bill 2425, aimed at tightening loose loan-documentation standards, known as “robo signings.” The bill mandates that mortgage companies establish a single contact for property owners going through a loan restructuring or foreclosure.
“That’s a huge problem,” Spitzer said, because the mortgage industry routinely buys and sells home loans between institutions. “Getting someone on the phone in these cases can be nearly impossible.”
In letters to legislators, the state chamber said the measures amount to a “de facto moratorium on foreclosures” that would actually hurt the real estate market with a confusing new set of laws, squeeze credit for property purchases and trigger a wave of lawsuits.
Youtube posted by Piggybankblog:
.
The chamber also contends the bills are in conflict with federal standards and are an “extraordinarily restrictive and draconian” permanent response to temporary industry abuses.
During the pre-hearing news conference, Harris defended the measures as common-sense legislation while a few dozen people stood behind her wearing yellow T-shirts with “Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment” printed in black letters.
According to its website, the nonprofit group is devoted to “building power in low to moderate income neighborhoods to stand and fight for social, economic, and racial justice.”
Many members of the group had come from the Bay Area to speak at the hearing, and booed and shouted at Eng for closing testimony, then wildly applauded when Harris began to speak.
“Excuse me, we don’t allow applause here,” Eng said.
Harris spoke for about four minutes, then retreated into a meeting and wasn’t available for questions. That fell to spokeswoman Lynda Gledhill.
Why did the bills get pulled? Weren’t there enough votes? What about two pieces of mirroring legislation in the Senate due for a hearing on Wednesday?
“Right now we’re working with the (Assembly) speaker’s office and the (Senate president) pro tem’s office,” Gledhill said, “to determine our next step.
So much for Kamala D. Harris being a “Pawn for the Banks.”
Instead – it sounds more like a potentially washed up Mitchell J. Stein might have been trying to use California homeowners as “A Pawn for his Defense” — but while maybe trying to turn California homeowners into human shields to protect himself from being held accountable for a potentially irregular, fraudulent, illegal and simply unethical mailer scam and business practices. That is because there are still many questions I have about his potential involvement. For example, why has Mitchell J. Stein never sued Attorney Phillip Kramer for using his name in an unethical mailer scheme? Certainly you or me would sue Kramer if we got in trouble for a mailer scheme that we had no part in, right? That’s why …… – click here Listen — I have a friend visiting me from New Mexico right now. He helps run a dairy farm where there are lots of cows in New Mexico. That is why he told me that he knows bullshit when he smells it. (Wink)
Temperament of a Doberman
.
The simple fact is that when it comes to Kamala D. Harris – homeowners in all states wish their attorney general could be California Girls. (Wink)
.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!
All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!
.
Stein Civil Rights lawsuit filed
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- Mitchell J. Stein Federal Arrest
- Brookstone Law WIN in Legaspi vs. Spivak Win
- Mitchell J. Stein Behind Spire Law Firm?
Follow John’s Daily Blog
.
Please donate liked today’s blog.
..
.
Interview With Mitch Stein And Attorney Eric Wittenberg of Spire Law Group
.
September 5th, 2012
Written by John Wright
.
Mitchell J. Stein was one of the nations leading trial and homeowner attorneys during the Great Mortgage Crisis of our times. Stein – who used to be an attorney in California — filed what was said to be the first lawsuit in behalf of the homeowners against Bank of America in 2009. Then homeowners across the nation would be shocked to find out that Mitchell J. Stein & Associates was raided and shutdown by the California Attorney General in August of 2011 for being accused of being part of a “mailer scheme” that was said to have schemed millions of homeowners out of millions of dollars. Then Mitchell J. Stein would be indicted and arrested four months later by the federal government in December of 2011. The federal government alleges that Mitchell J. Stein is potentially guilty of a stock pump and dump scheme in a company called Heart Tronic’s. His trial will be in Florida on May 3rd, 2013.
(CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:11-cr-80205-KAM-1)
- Part one: Who is Mitchell J. Stein?
- Part Two: The New York Lawsuit
- Part Three: The California Attorney General Raid and Federal Indictment and arrest.
Part One below (Who Mitchell J. Stein):
Some have come out against the lawsuit:
- Mandelman Matters comes out against lawsuit
- Get-out-of-Debt-Guy (Steve Rhode) has come against the lawsuit
.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!
All Rise! The Honorable Judge Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!
.
Follow John’s Daily Blog
Register to be part of my blog
.
Your donation makes a difference in my life.
….
.
.
.
PRIVACY NOTICE: Warning – any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or the comments made about my photos or any other “picture” art posted on my profile.
You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee , agent , student or any personnel under your direction or control.
The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
.
0 Comments
You can be the first one to leave a comment.