John’s Daily Blog Older #17 Date (05/08/12- 04/16/12)

. . .
.
.

May 8th to March 5th

But click here for today’s daily blog

May 8th, 2012

Well things seem to be a little more on track now that I have figured out that yesterday was not the 8th but was actually the 7th instead. I say this because I noticed that I had dated yesterday’s blog as May 8th, 2012. I guess that is what tends to happen when you are exhausted and overwhelmed from writing a daily blog practically every single day for two years. It is also what happens when you do not tend to get much sleep after making a new Facebook or Youtube video that had taken 18 hours straight to make. That’s right – I said 18 hours! This is why I do not tend to make them as much anymore – because they are time consuming. Another reason is that I have also noticed in the past that most people that come here to read just end up passing the Youtube up without watching it. Even considering — I still like to make a Youtube here and there and every once in a while because they help me relax in a way that can maybe only be explained by a person who paints on an empty canvas to calm their mind. In a like manner — it is also my way of expressing what I feel on the inside — and then onto a canvas for all of you to see my soul and the world through my eyes for a moment in time. I guess it could be said that my daily blog is also like a blank canvas that I use to reveal the deepest depths of my soul to all of you, while I always write from the heart and hold nothing back for the most part. This is because I write whatever is on my mind at that time that I am using this “pen without ink” that I have been given. For example, I have no idea what the next sentence is going to say until after I write it even right now. That is why I call it a “live act” and a “freestyle” of writing with an uninterrupted flow of thought. Now granted — that does not often work well for those who might have threatened to do something that would hurt me or my blog, which is why when (Name Redacted) was trying to torment me with the money he owed me with saying – “Ha! Ha! I’m in your mind John!” I could not understand why he would think that was such a good thing. (lol) Neither could it be a good thing for Mitchell J. Stein when I found out that he was involved later on — because he would end up “in my mind” and on my blog that day too because my blog is a journal. The funny thing is that these two potentially “self-described” geniuses seemed to be really working hard for it. Yet I will be their Huckleberry if they want. (Wink)

Now I would like to talk about something else on my mind. You see — many of us have been affected negatively in our personal lives by the fallout of losing almost everything we own because of what these banks did to our economy and personal lives. In some cases we even lost family and friends. In my case I lost my 25 year company and family and friends during the two years of fighting to keep it. It was truly one of the most emotionally trying times of my life at the time — and in some ways — it still is. Yet I have to say that I was not even half as shocked at losing my company — as I was at the lack of emotional support that I would receive from loved ones and friends that I had dedicated nearly half my life to helping both emotionally and financially. Even one or two of them found it appropriate to emotionally punish me during this time by ignoring my screams and cries for help. It was an unusually cruel lesson about people for me to learn – but I nevertheless did learn — because I intend to throw each and every single one of them out of my life for good. This is why I have spent the last few months slowly identifying and weeding these kinds of people out of my life — because I have simply wasted enough of my time and money and love on these types’ people. I could never trust them or think they loved me after this. That is because anyone who truly loved me could not have been so cruel with a punishment of me during this time. That is why for now on I will not let any of these people use me or treat me like crap ever again. I am done with these people taking advantage of me AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

There was this one time two years ago that I had to fire someone for disrespecting me as the owner of the company I owned. You see — I put over two hundred and sixty thousand dollars of my own money back into saving this company just for the employees to have a job. That is why there was no way I was going to take this kind of shit from anybody — and especially not from this person. So I responded by email to this persons mean and nasty four page email they had written me. It was obvious they were trying to hurt me too — because I assure you there was no stone left unturned in their email to me — while they had no problem ripping my fucking heart out while it was still beating. There seemed to be nothing considered sacred. They simply waited until they could see that I was most vulnerable before they did it. I remember it clearly — because I was typing a blog when I received the email from them. Even until today — this several page long email was the most horrible undeserved and unfair email that I have ever received from someone. The best part is that it came from someone that I was extremely generous to both financially and emotionally all their life. It was only after I was poor that I realized that this person was using me the entire time. Yet soon they were about to find out that I too had a poison keyboard.

I simply wrote back:

“I don’t like you. I don’t love you. And I don’t ever want to see you again.”

“I simply never knew you.”

That person “was” my son.

I dedicate this song to all the troublesome comforters of Job.

Matthew 10:36 – “A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.”

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

May 7th, 2012

How was your weekend? Mine was absolutely great! I had went to the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk to have lunch with a friend here on the coast of California. The City of Santa Cruz and the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk is where “The Lost Boys” movie was filmed. It is also where most of me and my high school friends used to play hooky from school and spend the day at the beach. Not to worry though – because we all got an “A” in all of our classes on those days. That is even if the “A” stood for “ABSENT.” (Wink) That is what is nice about living in Silicon Valley — because everything that is major fun is about thirty to forty five minutes to an hour or two hours away from where I live. For example, San Francisco is about forty five minutes north. Monterey is about an hour and forty five minutes south. Sacramento (The State Capitol) is about two hours north east. Tahoe is about three hours away from where I live. Now Southern California might as well be another state — because Los Angeles is about six hours away from where I live. That is why I went to lunch in Santa Cruz instead of Los Angles. The drive to Santa Cruz is always fun too. This is because the freeway over the mountain from San Jose is surrounded by beautiful green forest trees practically all the way there. I just put the convertible top down on my black Benz while jamming out to Steve Miller and The Eagles and Pink Floyd songs all the way to Santa Cruz. There is no feeling like it. – Song John played on the way to Santa Cruz I especially like the part where it says: “Northern California where the girls are warm.” (Wink)

Picture of Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk:

.

Judge Andler Refuses To Reconsider Throwing Out Intent to Conceal Fraud Cause of Action

The “Motion for Reconsideration” for the “intent to conceal fraud cause of action” being thrown out of the Wright et al vs. Bank of America lawsuit by the Honorable Judge Andler was heard on May 3rd, 2012. Attorney Deron Colby at Brookstone Law respectfully requested for Judge Andler to please reconsider her decision based on the new information that has come in about the Countrywide Whistleblower concerning the allegation surrounding Countrywide purposely inflating appraisals on homes. Unfortunately, though very cordial, the Honorable Judge Andler refused to reconsider her previous decision. This is why Attorney Deron Colby respectfully requested that Judge Andler please certify the issue for an interdictory appeal. Nevertheless, Judge Andler declined to do so, while saying that she was not inclined to “invite the Appellate Court to overturn her decision.” Just so that you understand — certifying the issue for appeal just makes the process easier — but it does not mean that the Plaintiffs in the Wright et al vs. Bank of America lawsuit cannot appeal the decision. In fact – Judge Andler even stated that she expected Brookstone Law to be at the Appellate Court across the street challenging her decision on the intent to conceal fraud claim. The good news is that the Honorable Judge Andler GRANTED THE MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD LANDSAFE. Now as most of you probably already know – LandSafe was the company that most of the borrowers were forced by Countrywide to use for the appraisal of their home — while at the center of controversy because the Whistleblower said they inflated the values. Then Judge Andler also GRANTED THE REQUEST TO HAVE ADDITIONAL TIME TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT. This was even though the Bryan Cave attorneys (Stuart Price and his associate Nafiz) completely protested against the extension. (Upper left picture is of Judge Gail Andler)

I am in receipt of a message sent to me from somebody who is saying they are a Bank of America employee who works in the infamous “Home Retention Department.” (unconfirmed employee)

On 05/07/12 LoneStarStruck wrote: It is a real mess at work everyday. Since the Home Retention Department has formed it has improved very little since 2008. People have been waiting for the FHA HAMP perm docs for over two years. Just recently since Feb 2012 there was a massive hiring of underwriters and Customer Service people resulting in a large number of perm docs going out finally — and most of them were incorrect and you can bet it will take 6 months to a year to fix ‘em. The moral is horrible and no leadership at all, HUD has been on our ass to be clearly accessible to the borrower when they call and so instead of moving files to underwriting we are answering every call so we can just say “Your file is in review” this is so our boss can turn in an excel spreadsheet with a good stat called the VRR (Virtual Ready Rate). It means we answered the phone and makes it look like we are attending to the borrower even though we don’t have anything to tell them and have already given false timelines for years now. (Upper left picture is of another Home Retention Team Employee)

On 5/05/12 Piggybankblogger JCMC wrote: John — This song has come to by my anthem when my thoughts and emotions turn to what is has been happening to us. I have never had a thought to “Rule the World” as the top 1% does. I only wished to live “the dream of the proud!” Just like everyone else, I was taken in by “the words that we did not understand.” I wish to dedicate this song to you and all that read your blog, but most especially to those politicians, Wall Street tycoons and Judges who have taken part in “The Turning Away!” This song clearly points the finger (the middle one) at those who would lie to and deceive us all. At the same time it is a song of hope for those of us whom have been victimized by those who are “Driven by a Heart of Stone”

No mater your taste in music, I believe that you will be able to relate to and enjoy the ballad “On the Turning Away” by Pink Floyd………..

Well JCMC – I guess today your song has become all of our anthems. That is because I have taken your comment one step further for you there my friend. I have actually used your song as the theme song in the new youtube that I made with the ships that many of the Piggybankblog supporters sent me to describe what their ship would look like while describing their struggle with all that Bank of Destroying The American Dream has done.

I pray everyday that all of your ships will be upon calm waters in the near the future.

Let it be done according to your faith.

Storm At Sea
By Amar Qamar
CRASHING waves… SMASHING seas…
Bringing sailors to their knees.
As they struggle to save their lives
Hoping and praying, help arrives.
The stormy seas as dark as coal,
Preventing the sailors from reaching their goal.
Battered and bruised, but still they fight…
Staring ahead, into the dead of night.
Rocking and rolling as they try to stand…
Hoping against hope, that they soon reach land.
Bleary eyed from lack of sleep.
Down in their cabins, huddled like sheep.
As they’re rocking and rolling down beneath
Weary sailors above, resist with gritted teeth.
Hours later, as the storm starts to dissipate,
It leaves a calm tranquil sea in it wake.
The veteran sailors know the battle is over, and they have won…
As they contemplate, other storms yet to come…

Hang in there. We are all in this together.

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

May 4th, 2012

I finally found some time to watch the Frontline special titled: “Global Economic Crisis — Money, Power and Wall Street.” It was pretty good too. It explained who, what, when, where, and why Credit Default Swaps were created. Basically Credit Default Swaps are a financial swap agreement that the seller of the CDS will compensate the buyer in the event of a loan default or other credit event. The buyer of the CDS makes a series of payments to the seller and, in exchange, receives a payoff if the loan defaults. This is what drove banks like Countrywide Home Loans to give loans to people for homes that people could not afford. This was because basically there would always be an investor interested in buying the loan if it was insured — because it meant they could not lose any money. Yet banks like Countrywide were basically committing an insurance scam. This is because they knew they were giving mortgages to people who could not afford them but did not care because they were interested in the insurance money. It was also why insurance giants like AIG would end up having to get a bailout when the bottom fell out of the housing market. This is because AIG did not have enough money on hand to pay out all these instant insurance claims all at once – and neither did any insurance company or bank for that matter.

Frontline goes on to explain that Credit Default Swaps were created by a few 20 something year olds from JP Morgan Chase at a retreat in Florida in Boca Raton at some hotel. They were trying to eliminate risk on these loans for the bank. That is when they came up with finding companies that would insure the loans. Frontline points out that the very first Credit Default Swap loan to be given was to Exxon because they needed money after the Exon Valdez oil spill. Yet the creators of the Credit Default Swap industry had no idea that the other banks would start using this process for home loans years down the line. That is why these young 20 something year old banking Credit Default Swap inventors much have felt much like Oppenheimer felt when he watched the world use his findings to create a weapon of massive destruction called the nuclear bomb — which incidentally — is not a bad comparison after you consider that Credit Default Swaps might be responsible for collapsing the entire world’s economy.

The Frontline piece goes on to explain that United States Treasury Secretary Paulson FORCED THE BANKS TO TAKE THE BAILOUT MONEY by threatening to have the regulators shut them down if they did not take it. This would be done in a way that Communist China might have been saying - “What’s the matter America? Free unregulated market Capitalism not working for you?” Either way, if our government was going to turn into a dictatorship that was planning on interfering with the everyday business of private companies — I only wish they would have done it before Credit Default Swaps were created. This is because the simple fact is that this crisis would have never happened if the regulators were not asleep at the wheel when Credit Default Swaps were being created and used for home loans.

Welcome to the American Nightmare — brought to you by the banks!

Breaking News: Bank Loan Bundling Investigated by Biden-Schneiderman: Mortgages

See you on Monday kids!

My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

May 3rd, 2012

New York Attorney General Eric Schniederman has long been considered a hero for being outspoken about how he will not let the banks walk away “free and clear” from the crimes they committed leading up to The Great Mortgage Crisis. That is why many Americans were excited to hear the announcement that Eric Schniederman (aka Spiderman) would be co-chairing in a Federal Committee to investigate mortgage abuses along with the United States Justice Department’s newly formed Federal Task Force. Yet poor New York Attorney General Schneiderman has been taking a lot of heat lately for the Federal Task Force not doing enough in the three months since the announcement was made by our President. This is mainly because two writers of the Metro Industrial Areas Foundation had written in an opinion piece for the New York Daily News that said: “promises of the President led to little or no concrete action.” – Huffington post article Basically it appeared that the liberal activist were already declaring the effort to be a “sham.”

Apparently Congresswoman Maxine Waters seemed concerned about how they have not even chosen an executive director yet. Congresswoman Waters then ends up writing them a letter with a suggestion.

Dear Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group Co-Chairs:

We are writing to you today in your capacity as co-chairs of the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) Working Group to request that you select Representative Brad Miller (NC-13) to be the executive director of this new task force.

Rep. Miller has the best mix of skills and experience to steer this new Working Group. As colleagues of Rep. Miller in Congress, we’ve seen that he’s committed his career to protecting consumers and fighting financial fraud. His achievements include authorship of the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2009, which was ultimately included in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Rep. Miller also co-wrote the original legislation that led to the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, has been a fierce and prescient advocate for principal reduction, and has fought to reform mortgage servicing. The Congressman has likewise been a leading advocate in Congress for the financial protection of servicemembers facing economic hardship and foreclosure.

Finally, it is important to note that prior to entering Congress in 2003, Rep. Miller was a civil litigator with 20 years of experience.

In January, President Obama announced that the RMBS Working Group “will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.” The primary means of achieving these goals is through an investigation into the creation and sale of securities backed by residential mortgages leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, and prosecution of any wrongdoing uncovered. We agree that this effort is crucial to providing long-awaited restitution to homeowners and investors, restoring the integrity of American capital markets, and preventing the next financial crisis.

With that said, we were dismayed by recent press reports indicating that the RMBS Working Group does not yet have phones, office headquarters, or an executive director. We understand that the task force is leveraging pre-existing enforcement efforts and staff at participating agencies, but we remain concerned that the Working Group has not independently established a robust infrastructure commensurate with the charge of investigating this component of the 2008 financial crisis.

With three months having passed since the initial announcement of the creation of the RMBS Working Group, we fear that this group’s efforts may be stalled. The best way to reignite this important undertaking is to hire a qualified, aggressive and committed executive director, and give them the power and budget to hire the necessary support staff. Without quick action in this regard, public confidence in the Working Group may be at risk.

We would welcome the opportunity to speak with you further about this request, and we are eager to do anything we can, as Members of Congress, to facilitate the success of the RMBS task force.

End of letter.

A spokesman from Schneiderman’s office stated that the two writers assessment was not accurate quoted in the New York Daily News .

Email from an Eric Schneiderman office spokesman reads:

“The working group already includes more than 50 attorneys, investigators and analysts across the country,” said Danny Kanner, a spokesman for Schneiderman.”

The Schneiderman spokesman further stated that Schneiderman, Lanny Breuer and Tony West, assistant attorneys general at the Department of Justice; Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s Director of enforcement; and John Walsh, U.S. Attorney for the district of Colorado “meet weekly and speak daily.”

Well it would be nice if they would stop meeting and start arresting instead. Yet I have to agree that it might be a little premature to begin saying Schneiderman and the others are not doing enough only after three months of the Federal Task Force being assembled. This is because it is my observation that it usually takes about six months before we see any results of any government investigation. That is why I am not pissed off that we have not seen much after three months. Yet I am pissed off that it has taken the President of The United States and the United States Justice Department nearly five years to start investigating. That is what I am pissed off about.

Yet I still trust New York Attorney General Eric Scheiderman.

Schneiderman said: “There is no equal justice under law if you’re going in to fight a bank of foreclosure and you don’t have a lawyer.”

Amen to that! That is why I think everyone facing foreclosure should be obtaining an attorney if they feel there are legal violations. This is especially considering that studies have come back showing that the majority of loans have a broken chain of title because there are multiple trusts and multiple beneficiaries. This might be making it virtually impossible for Bank of Destroying The American Dream to accurately identify the correct investor or owner of the debt at the time of the fraudclosure. That is why I am prayng every day that Wall of Fame Winner California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris stops them because the law clearly stipulates:

U.C.C. provision, U.C.C. §3-305(c): “An obligor is not obliged to pay the instrument if the person seeking enforcement of the instrument does not have rights of a holder in due course and the obligor proves that the instrument is a lost or stolen instrument.”

Now many concluded that it was the banks being allowed to mix with Wall Street that was the main ingredients causing The Great Depression. That is why there were certain laws passed to stop the banks from ever leading our country to an economic Armageddon to this level ever again. One of those laws stopped the banks from doing business over state lines. Another one of those laws was to stop the banks from doing business with investment banks and Wall Street. Yet Schneiderman points out in the youtube above that the deregulations of these banks started during the Reagan Revolution years. Now the Nixon administration had kicked the idea around before the Reagan administration. However it was Reagam’s administration that would end up convincing congress to scrap the laws that stopped the banks from being able to do business over state lines. What did this mean? Well it meant that the banks could now get involved in commercial deals on an international level. It would then result in the banking industry being dominated by only few major big city banks who were now involved in international speculation and investment.

Schneiderman then mentioned what the MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR was to the current crisis when he said:

“This is not something that is shrouding in secrecy. The deregulatory history that led to the crash is essentially uncontested. It’s well known that the Glass-Steagall Act separating commercial banks from investment banks was repealed.”

Now who was it that got the Glass-Steagall Act repealed?

In 2010 Clinton finally admits he was wrong to not regulate

Now you know why I want to vomit every time I hear Bill Clinton brag about the great economy he created. That is because all he did was create a bubble that would blow up the American Dream along with the American economy with it in a way that he should be ashamed of — not proud of.

Either way — both former President Reagan’s and former President Clinton’s chickens came home to roost during our time. This is why it might be our generation that is able to finally answer Ronald Reagans question of: “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”

Answer: “No. But the banks are.”

That is why every state in the nation is still singing your State Song Eric Schneiderman.

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

May 2nd, 2012

I was pleased to hear that many of you related with what I said about President Obama’s reference that he made in his speech in regards to helping ONLY the “responsible homeowners.” This is because I am quite certain that the President was drawing some kind of line between those who continued to keep current with their potentially fraudulent mortgage and those who are not current with their potentially fraudulent mortgage. Now granted there a variety of reasons for why a person may choose to stop paying their mortgage.

For example:

There were borrowers who could not afford their mortgage right from the start. Well that is the banks’ fault. They should not have loaned them the money. The bank did not care though because they were more interested in the insurance. They simply could not lose by giving a home loan to someone who could not afford mortgage because of our “irresponsible government.”
There were borrowers who bought a house they could afford their mortgage at the start. Then they could not afford it now that the economy was allowed by the government to be destroyed by the banks. They can no longer afford the payments because of our “irresponsible government.” Now the President was willing to help these “irresponsible homeowners” with a program called HAMP in the past. He gave us HAMP during a time where he was not offering assistance to “responsible homeowners.” HAMP SUCKED AND FAILED MISERABLY. This is because the bank would end up making sure that practically nobody qualified for HAMP, so they could lead the person to fraudclosure as part of an insurance scam.
There are the borrowers who bought a house who could afford their mortgage. Then they did not pay it because they are concerned about there being a break in the chain of title. These people put their mortgage payment aside until the bank can accurately identify the true investor or owner of the debt.

Now the President wants to talk about helping only “responsible homeowners.” This can only be meant to mean that he is talking about people who continue to facilitate the banks crime by making their monthly mortgage payment. The President must be talking about only helping the ones current on their payments as being “responsible homeowners.” This is because we already know that none of us are going to ever qualify for a refinance after the banks destroyed our credit.

The only ironic thing here is that I am quite sure that President Obama is depending on the very same banks that were entrusted to be fair with dispersing the government HAMP program to now be in control of deciding who will be determined a “responsible homeowner” and “irresponsible homeowner.” This would be much in the same way he allowed them to decide who would qualify for HAMP and who would not qualify for HAMP. This will of course probably involve the President making the taxpayer pay the banks to “service” his new reward program to “responsible homeowner” program — but just like he made us pay the banks to “service” HAMP. Yet we all know what is going to happen. The banks will gladly take the taxpayer money again with the SAME CONSEQUENCES AS HAMP. They will simply declare the majority of the homeowner’s who are current as “irresponsible homeowners” instead of “responsible homeowners” because they were ONE DAY LATE. This way they can push them into a “in-house refinance” where the bank can make more money. This would be much in the same way they tried to push people into a “in-house modification program” that would make the bank more money instead of qualifying them for HAMP.

Here is the best part! President Obama’s plan would end up rewarding all the criminal bankers and Wall Street people who caused this crisis with their greed and their crimes. This is because they would be labeled “responsible homeowners” for paying their mortgage on time. This is even though they are paying it on time with the criminal money they made collapsing the American economy and housing market with their greed. Well there goes holding them accountable.

In the end the President had a plan for “responsible homeowners” in his speech. Then the President would also show he has a plan for catching those who committed financial crimes that would lead to the collapse of the housing market and American economy. There was only one group of people that the President did not seem to offer a plan for in his speech.

THE VICTIMS OF THE CRIMES HE MENTIONED.

Then again maybe President Obama does have a plan for the victims of these crimes he mentioned. He plans on letting the banks continue to fraudclose on the victims. This is because it helps the economy look good for when he runs for office again — much in the same way the injustice was allowed to continue against the Jews because it helped Germany’s economy at one time. In other words — President Obama might be willing to allow all of us to die just so he can live.

Thus making former President Ronald Regan’s words come true when he said: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”

Maybe President Obama should listen to former President Ronald Regan.

It seems Piggybankblogger Senka has become a star!

Meet the Voice of Angry Homeowners

Posted by Piggybankblog 05/02/12

Picture posted by Piggybankblog

Cross linked with americanbanker.com

Senka Huskic is mad, very mad and wants you to share that anger. Think a “Network” kind of anger, a Howard Beale kind of anger, a genuine bona fide “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” kind of anger.

What’s she angry about? The ever-climbing foreclosure rate — at a time when the megabanks are continuing to show profitable balance sheets.

She’s been shouting it out to anyone who’ll listen. This forty-something Peabody, Mass. mother has a lot to be angry about. She was angry when her family was driven from their home in Bosnia, in 1992, at the start of that awful war. And she was angry eighteen years later when she ran up against B of A as she started trying to get loan modification for her mortgage.

Every notable historical battle that’s pitted the outraged against the outrageous actions of the oppressors has had its Senka. In France, during the revolution you had Marianne – that symbol of reason and liberty — immortalized in Delacroix’s “Liberty Leading the People.” During the Spanish Civil War you had firebrands Dolores Ibarruri, “La Pasionaria” and Frederica Montseny, rallying supporters in defense of the Republic against the assault of Franco and his cohorts.

Senka arrived in this country in 1995 with a hopeful vision of a much brighter future for her children. But she realized in the wake of the financial meltdown, that the field wasn’t exactly level and that homeowners weren’t accorded the same sort of relief as the big banks. That didn’t compute with her deep love of a country whose citizens, she felt, are by nature fair, kind, friendly and generous. So when it came to the robo-signing actions of the banks, the servicers, the GSEs, all the moving parts of the foreclosure machine, it was enough to get her blood boiling again.

Like a previous generation of 19th and early 20th century working-class activists, self-educated workers, Senka embarked on a voracious quest to understand the origins and backstories surrounding the current foreclosure mess, one that seems to still be getting worse by leaps and bounds.

“I don’t understand why more people are not furious about what’s going on,” she’s quick to note, and with a passion started blogging as a way to express the rage.

While her home remains in limbo with B of A, she’s actively networking, 24/7, with others in the anti-foreclosure movement, sharing, planning and strategizing. She’s the kind of activist that keeps megabankers up at night, their worst nightmare come true: a pit bull who won’t let go until the fraudsters end up spending quality time at places like Allenwood, USP.

One group she’s affiliated with – the Foreclosure Defense League — plans to start up educational workshops around Massachusetts in May with the goal of keeping homeowners abreast of the latest news on the foreclosure front: revelations, research and legal proceedings.

The group is also aiming to bring in homeowners who may be current on their payments, who may have successfully modified their loans, but whose mortgages were originated at a time when financial shenanigans were running unchecked. While safe in their houses for the time being, Senka says, there exists the distinct possibility that they may soon be sharing the same boat as their brethren already in foreclosure.

Now, if you really want to share Senka’s sense of outrage, try these statistics on for size: A recently released Brookings Institution study reports that five years into the housing crisis, 2.3 million children have lost homes to foreclosure; another 3 million are at risk of the same; 3 million have been evicted, or are at danger of being evicted, from rental properties. “Children,” the report highlights are “the often invisible victims of foreclosure.”

Senka is one of many foreclosure fighters gearing up for a May Day spring offensive, replete with demonstrations, sit-ins, foreclosure auction disruptions, all planned as part of a broader strategy that underscores the need for a national moratorium on foreclosures. Activists are referring to it as a “freeze” and one that shouldn’t thaw until a DOJ investigation — one with real teeth — is completed.

Congraulations Senka!

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

May 1st, 2012

Now many Americans have been very disappointed in the newly formed Financial Crime Unit that President Obama announced in his State of The Union Speech last January. In his speech the President had announced to Americans that he would be ordering Eric Holder of the United States Justice Department to form a Financial Crimes Unit to supposedly investigate and hold accountable any big bank or person that might be found guilty of committing securitization and mortgage selling and foreclosure abuses. That is because it was these kinds of abuses that might have lead this nation and the American people into the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression. Now at the time of this speech the majority of Americans felt that this was a political move being done by the President to give the “appearance” that something was being done about it. Yet the respected President of the United States should understand that many Americans are no longer watching baseball when we are having our homes stolen from us by the banks. We are watching politics instead. That is why Americans might be wondering right about now why it has taken the President and the United States Justice Department this long to create a Financial Crime Unit? I mean — Are you telling me that they did not notice that something was a little weird with mortgage industry unitl January of 2012? With that being said, did the President of the United States really have to create a Financial Crime Unit before something could be done by the United States Justice Department? This is because I kind of thought The Financial Crime Unit had already been created on the day they created something called “The United States Justice Department.” Are you telling me that the United States Justice Department and the President of The United States have been just sitting there doing nothing about this until now? That is certainly what it might imply if they have waited until January of 2012 to have the United States Justice Department investigate all this.

(Start youtube at 40:30)

Notice Obama said “responsible homeowner” in his speech. Is he going to be the one that will decide who is the “responsible homeowner” and who is the “irresponsible homeowner” at the end of the day? Maybe so — since he is the one that said nobody is going to get a home free and clear — even though it is the law when there is a break in the chain of title. Yet I want to know — are Americans who lost their job because of the economic crisis the banks caused with their crime and greed they were allowed and still are allowed to do considered “responsible homeowners” or “irresponsible homeowners” by Obama? And what about our “irresponsible government” that was asleep at the wheel when these banks were collapsing the economy with their crime and greed?

Now this is exactly why Americans think this new “Unit” has only been created for the appearance they they are actually doing something — instead of actually holding those accountable who commited these crimes. It is also why the American people are simply tired of these bullshit programs being announced by President Obama. For example, does anyone remember the last program that President Obama launched that was meant to help the homeowner? I think it was called “HAMP.” – Congressman Cummings about HAMP

What a wonderful program that was! At any rate, it was another Obama program that was supposed to help lead the struggling American homeowner to a modification. Yet it would end up leading the American homeowner into an illegal foreclosure process instead. In the end — HAMP basically became an accomplice to helping the banks commit their crimes. Then to add insult to injury the Obama Administration and the United States Justice Department continues to allow the banks to get away with things like “Robo Signing” and “MERS” — but only to have the President of the United States look right into the news camera when he said that nobody was going to get a home free and clear. Yet he should have said that nobody was going to get a home free and clear EXCEPT THE BANKS. That is because that is exactly what they are getting if the banks are allowed to foreclose on a home where there are multiple trusts and multiple beneficiaries existing — and to the point that the banks are unable to accurately identify the actual investor or owner of that debt. That is why I think the President and the United States Justice Department and justice system do not want to accept evidence that there has been a break in the chain of title on the majority of homeowner’s homes — because then THE REAL BANK OF AMERICA (FANNIE AND FREDDIE) will not able to be able to fraudclose anymore either.

In the end Americans might simply have no faith in President Obama and the United States Justice Department newly formed and announced Financial Crime Unit. That is until the bankers and those on Wall Street are held accountable for the their crimes they committed. That is also until all foreclosures using “MERS” and “Robo Signing” are stopped with no further delay.

Please don’t worry about Americans looking for a free house Mr. President. Instead, please try to just worry about us Americans looking for a free country where the banks are held accountable. (Wink)

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

April 30th 2012

How was everyone’s weekend? My weekend sucked! That is only because I pulled a muscle in my back while I was typing a blog on Friday. This unfortunately made it to where my back and my typing arm were in constant pain all weekend long. I don’t know – maybe (Name Redacted) and Mitchell J. Stein had some kind voodoo doll of me that they were sticking pins and needles in or something, after they found out their potential smear campaign of me and the others failed miserably — if not just backfired in their face. Hey — it is not my fault they might have ended up more the “dynamic fool” instead of the “dynamic duo” in the end. I guess that is what happens when “self-described” geniuses get together. (Wink) When are these kinds of potential fools going to learn that I am the master of this domain? For example, I would never be foolish enough to think that I would be smarter than Mitchell J. Stein in a Court of Law. Yet he is not in the Court of Law here. He is in my Court of Public Opinion. (Wink) That is why I just roll my eyes at the things he says, which incidentaly, is just like the Honorable Judge Jane Johnson rolled her eyes at what he said in courtroom. I get it now Judge Johnson. We now roll our eyes with you. (Wink) I mean come on! (lol) He should have known that I have built myself and Piggybankblog.com to defend me and my supporters from any attacks from what used to be considered the largest bank in the world at one time. It should only stand to reason why I would be able use my many legally sound resources to defend myself and my supporters from any fake character assignation attempt from anyone who dared to try. I just start pushing buttons and making calls — and game over.

What I mean is — I am built for larger attacks than from some 22 year old potentially disgruntled “Boy Wonder” and potentially “washed up attorney” arrested by the feds. Please tell me he did not choose a 22 year old young man to fight against me as his new Darth Vadar? (yawn) I mean — I have been known to make grown men with tattoos cry for crying out loud. (lol) That is why I would suggest that it would be like throwing some kid in a cage with a tiger just to watch them get eaten alive when the tiger is forced to protect himself. Now that is a cruel thing to do to poor young Anikan. (Wink)

Nevertheless, I was sort of disappointed that I ended up having to write about Mitchell J. Stein again because of it. This is because I was actually done writing about this made Not Eligible To Practice Law by the State Bar Association.

Yet just when I get out they pull be back in.

Listen they just need to lick their wounds from losing against Brookstone Law and leave me out of this law firm warfare stuff. That is unless they want me to be involved, in which I cannot imagine why they would want that. It is not my fault he talked a big game and then lost against Brookstone Law. And yet he is going to win against some of the largest banks in the world, right? (Wink) Whatever! Sorry — but I just happen to be one who believes in that saying that says: “You can fool some of the people all of the time. And all of the people some of the time. But you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.” – Abraham Lincoln.

Either way — I do not want to be involved with any law firm warfare. It always did annoy me how Stein was constantly trying to pull me into it. I think he is trying to pull me into it again because he thinks Brookstone Laws tells me to write things like – “Ding Dong The Mitch is Dead” and stuff like that. Not true! I did it because I WANTED TO! I thought it was funny! So did everyone else from what I heard. I wrote it because it was funny! There was no other reason — and in fact — I am still giggling my little fucking ass off every time I think about it. As far as the Spire law blog I wrote that because too many people sent me emails wanting me to do a story on it because they wanted answers. I was actually going to be very kind to Attorney Eric W.. That was the whole reason I asked for a comment or an interview. He instead disrespected me by saying rude things about me and to me in an email. Yet other than that — I was truthfully done writing about Mitchell J. Stein, Toby Butterworthless and — Fire Law Firm — I mean Spire Law Group . (Smirk)

So as you can see — I receive plenty of emails from plenty of people wanting me to post their evidence and complaints against Mitchell J. Stein and Spire Law Group and Toby Butterwortheless and Attorney Eric W. In fact — I don’t think a day goes by where somebody is not sending me something. I just simply don’t post them because I am not intrested anymore. That is why they should be happy that I am posting “Ding Dong The Mitch Is Dead” instead. This is because I assure you they rather have me do that than post stuff like tbe “Dear Selfish Mitch” email. Now that one had me laughing my ass off when I read the whole thing. It was an email that a supporter said she received from some bk attorney that used to work for Mitchell J. Stein and his firm — who apparently — seemed to be spilling the beans on the operation when she sent it to Mitch and a few clients. It sounds like that person who threatened me a year ago might have been right about the just being a settlement attorney thing after all. Read Threat I thought it was really nice of me not to post that “Dear Selfish Mitch” email. Yet — some people can be just so selfish…..Mitch. (smirk)

And what the hell is this press release everybody is sending me?

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Home-Owners-Across-Nation-Sue-All-Bank-Servicers-Their-Offshore-Havens-Spire-Law-1647025.htm

Is anyone even really sure that this lawsuit was really filed? I am asking because I noticed only an index number and not a case number. How do we know it was not just a press release meant for sending out to their clients to give them impression that a lawsuit had been filed — but only so they would keep paying? I am hoping that it has been finally filed because I have been receiving a lot of emails from people who were concerned. Personally — I actually like the fact that they are going after the off shore stuff. That is why I am excited for the clients if it has really been filed. In fact I would be happy to post it on the page where I had written about Attorney Eric W. if it has been really filed. That is because it was the whole reason that I had written the blog about Spire Law Group. Certainly was not because I thought he was talented. It was because people were complaining that they were being told to pay for a lawsuit that was always going to be filed the next week — just to end up not being filed for months. That is why I would be very excited to find out this has been really filed. Maybe one of you attorneys out there can check for me — and then shoot me an email after.

Update on 05/03/12:

A Piggybankblogger sent me the following email that Toby is sending out to clients.

This email is being blasted to nearly 1000 clients of the Firm.

As most of you are aware, the Firm has been working diligently to finish and file the newest lawsuit against nearly all large bank servicers, several hundred foreign entities and over 1300 loan trusts. The newest case filed in New York on April 17, 2012, styled Abeel vs. Bank of America, etc, et al, is causing quite a stir. Recently, the Wall Street Journal and the Occupy Wall Street organization have featured the lawsuit in their publications. It is the most unique legal action against the Banks to date. In fact, it is the largest complaint in terms of number of parties, in the history of the Kings County Courthouse. Based on evidence discovered this year by our Firm, this lawsuit will expose exactly how all of this country’s largest bank servicers conspired with each other as well as several hundred offshore companies to steal money from homeowners across the nation and launder this same money to avoid detection for many reasons, including the avoidance of their tax obligations. The Firm believes that through the discovery process there will be evidence uncovered that may reach all the way to the office of the President of the United States.

If you are receiving this email, it means you are named as a plaintiff on this newest legal action. The reason the Firm filed this lawsuit in New York is because most of the defendants reside and only do significant business in that state, which means only New York State courts have jurisdiction.

I have attached a conformed, file-stamped copy of the lawsuit for you to read. Also, please visit the link below to see the official press release, which gives an overview of the lawsuit and its ramifications.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/home-owners-across-the-nation-sue-all-bank-servicers-and-their-offshore-havens-spire-law-officially-announces-filing-of-landmark-lawsuit-2012-04-23.

We will be keeping you posted with the latest developments in this case and others.

Sincerely,

Toby Butterworth

Spire Law Group LLP

Mitchell J. Stein & Associates LLP.

Law Offices of Erikson M. Davis.

One of their clients who sent me the press release had the following to say about: “How stupid does Stein think people are? Pay $800.00/mo for this? Fuck them!”

It appears you might have another critic Spire Law Group!

The truth is that I just don’t always want to post things I get about Stein. I just don’t think he matters anymore because I truly feel that Mitchell J. Stein is no longer a power to be reckoned with for the banks. Unfortunately, I am just not a person who believes that his strength is in writing up lawsuits behind the scenes for another attorney to potentially go preform like a monkey for him.

Apparently, I am not alone with this opinion either.

“The Complaint challenged by this motion is one of the most addled pieces of legal drafting this Court has ever seen in 40 years of legal practice and judicial service.”

That was the words of the Honorable Judge Highberger in the Legaspi vs. Spivak lawsuit. Apparently he has not seen the others one he he drafted. (lol) Lucky him!

Now listen — I understand that one man’s trash could be another man’s treasure. That is why I respect that there might be some people out here that still believe in Mitchell J. Stein. I just have not met any of them. However, regardless to what some may think I have not really been fighting against Mitchell J. Stein though — and I think he knows that. Or, at least he should anyway. This is because he should know that it would look completely different than this if I were actually fighting back.

In the end I simply sent Mitchell J. Stein the “Goodbye Yellow Brick Road” link in an email the day I left. It had no other content in the email — just the link. It was my goodbye to him.

Song lyrics:

You know you can’t hold me forever
I didn’t sign up with you
I’m not a present for your friends to open
This boy’s too young to be singing the blues
Maybe you’ll get a replacement
There’s plenty like me to be found
Mongrels who ain’t got a penny
Sniffing for tidbits like you on the ground

Now as far as (Name Redacted) – I don’t hope they go out of business or anything like that. That is not why I have posted a consumer alert or protest. In reality, I am actually hoping they make the appropriate changes to make them a successful title and search company that is safe for the public to use. This is because I am a person who firmly believes that the break in the chain of title issue is a real one. I believed this even before I had decided to advertise a title and search company on my site. That is why I believe in the title and securitization report being done. I just do not believe in it being done by ANY of these title and securitization search companies that have popped up that are heavily marketing directly to the homeowners and attorneys. It is also why I will never accept money for advertising from another title and search company in the future. I simply have a better understanding of the industry now after my experience with (Name of Company Redacted) to ever take a chance on another title and search company. I was also further educated and convinced by a blogger who had a conversation with me through the comment section of my daily blog. Unfortunately, as usual, my daily blog portion collapsed and I lost the comments when I had to start a new page. This does not happen with any of the other pages in my blog – but only in my daily blog — because Word Press was not built for someone like me who does a continual scrolling down daily blog. That is why I have decided to post the comment in a separate blog page for you all to read.

In addition, they also sent me a “marketing email” that (Name Redacted) has apparently been sending to attorneys. It was a prime example of exactly one of the many reasons I want nothing to do with (Name Redacted) This is because, in my opinion, it was as cheesy as marketing to doctors with a “marketing email” figuratively advertising a “buy one heart and get one heart for free.” It is that gross to me. Anyway, I also have my concern about (Name of Company Redacted) saying they will “advertise for the attorney” if they sell their product. This is because — to me — it almost sounds as if they are saying they want some kind of kick back for advertising the attorney. Call me a genius — but I fear it is only a matter of time before a Bank of America attorney is going to pull this “marketing email” out in court wherever there is a (Name Redacted) report used in a homeowner’s defense. I tried to warn (Name Redacted) – but he rudely responded back suggesting that there is nothing wrong with it. He was suggesting there was nothing that the bank attorney can do about it. (sigh) (lol) He must mean just like he was right about the affidavit thing. — affidavit page Oh what do I know. Okay — well I hope the genius is right this time.

It was potentially inexperienced things like this email for why I would end up figuratively telling (Name of Company Redacted) to “Take this job and shove it. I ain’t working her no more.”

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

April 27th, 2012

It has been alleged in the past that Bank of America uses crooked law firms to use “improper tactics” towards any attorney that dares to bring a wrongful foreclosure lawsuit on behalf of the homeowner against Bank of Defrauding America. Some have said they believe that this might be an attempt by Bank of Extorting America to deter homeowner’s attorneys from filing wrongful foreclosure lawsuits against them, while they believe it just another prime example of Bank of Abusing America’s potentially using irregular, fraudulent, unsafe, illegal and simply abusive mafia type practices — that they use against both the legal system and the good people the United States of America.

On July 19th, 2011 — A Santa Ana 39 year attorney named Gary Lane filed an individual lawsuit against a Bank of America attorney in California Superior Court of Orange County. This lawsuit was filed against, none other than, the infamous Stuart Price. Stuart Price is a senior partner at the Bryan Cave Law Firm that is representing maybe one of the most criminal enterprises in the nation, Bank of Destroying America. Now for those of you who do not already know this – Attorney Stuart Price is actually the attorney representing Bank of America in the Wright et al vs. Bank of America lawsuit.

Gary Lane was informed by counsel that it might be far too difficult to challenge an attorney for such offenses — and that the slap laws of California made it almost assured that they would be forced to pay Price’s attorney fees if they pursued the case. So, upon that advice, Lane withdrew his case almost immediately. However, strangely enough, Stuart Price, in spite of their prompt voluntary dismissal of the case against him, filed an action against them anyway. He demanded that they pay not only the attorney fees he had demanded — but an additional approximately $7,000 more. This is AFTER the case had been voluntarily dismissed by Lane. Then Gary Lane appeared in Superior Court November 4, and Bryan Cave’s attorney, Jennifer Jackson, demanded that they pay Price’s attorney fees. This is even if Bryan Cave was not going to require Price to pay his own firm. The Judge, under the impression that he had no discretion in this matter, ordered Lane to pay Stuart Price’s demand for attorney fees of over $32,000 — in full.

The Complaint filed against Stuart Price alleged that Price used “improper tactics” that harmed Attorney Gary Lane and his business. This is because Mr. Lane said that he had to spend countless hours just responding to Stuart’s potentially illegitimate complaints that were filed with the California State Bar Association. These complaints filed might be better described as a “Chew on this for a while Gary Lane” tactic used by Stuart Price. Now just how many complaints did Mr. Price file with the California State Bar Association? Stuart ended up citing A WHOPPING SEVENTY EIGHT of Gary Lane’s cases. That’s right! That’s what I said! SEVENTY EIGHT! Unfortunately, this would require poor Mr. Lane to respond individually to each every one of the SEVENTY EIGHT cases WITHIN ONE MONTH which is required by the California State Bar Association. However, since all 78 complaints seemed to come FROM ONE INDIVIDUAL, Stuart Price, and all were done at the same time, the California State Bar Association gave Gary Lane a whopping extra one month to respond to each complaint. Even considering — Attorney Lane was forced to spend many hours dealing with these potentially illegitimate complaints, which according to Gary Lane, was much to the detriment of his Santa Ana based business. Attorney Gary Lane has operated a non-profit legal clinic for just a little over three years named “Consumer Protecting Assistance Coalition.” (Picture is of Stuart Price)

The lawsuit alleged that Attorney Stuart Price:

Made it a practice to demurrer (motion to dismiss) every single Complaint filed by Mr. Lane against Bank of America.
Made it a practice to include an introduction in the demurrers that make allegations about Gary Lane directly, personally, and by name as a means to impugn Mr. Lanes character, professional reputation, professional practices — and professional ethics.
Personally had taken purposeful action to attempt to discredit Attorney Gary Lane in a way that is meant to interfere with Mr. Lane’s management of this business — and do harm to his professional reputation, future career, and current and future earnings potential.

Attorney Stuart Price potentially used similar character assignation “tactics” against the attorney in my first lawsuit that I had filed against Bank of America several years ago. This was a lawsuit that I had filed before I was with Brookstone Law. I remember being stunned at the fact that Stuart’s answer to the Complaint seemed to have very little to do with the merits of my lawsuit. It instead seemed to show that Mr. Price was more focused on trying to discredit my attorney as part of some “dirty or improper tactic” that he might have been trying to use. I mean, it was so ridiculous that I would not have been surprised if I read that my attorney had received a traffic ticket when he sixteen years old, because his whole response was that absurd. I even remember calling the law firm to tell them that I thought they had sent me the wrong lawsuit. That is when it became readily apparent to me that the Bank of America attorney was turning my lawsuit into a trial for my attorney – instead of allowing me to have my day in court with the issues surrounding my house. It seemed to be an “improper tactic” or “dirty trick,” because it should have been about my character — and not based on whatever online complaint that was issued about my attorney in the past. For all I knew – Stuart could have been the one that entered that complaint online. However, and for the record, Attorney Deron Colby at Brookstone Law has told me that Stuart Price has been nothing but a professional and a gentleman to him regarding the Wright et al vs. Bank of America lawsuit. That is why I am guessing that Attorney Deron Colby must have not ever received a traffic ticket in his past. (Wink) Also, for the record, I really do not know Attorney Gary Lane at all. What I am saying is — I do not know if there is any validity to Mr. Price’s claims or not. That is why I really do not take any position on the validity of the allegations on either side. I am just telling the story. (picture of Gary lane posted above.) (Picture is of Gary Lane)

On April, 13th, 2012, in the Superior Court of California in the County of Orange — Gary Lane has successfully won the right to have his appeal heard by the Court of Appeals. They will now hold a hearing. The purpose of that hearing will be to see if Gary Lane will be allowed to proceed against Stuart Price for his alleged “improper actions” as an attorney representing Bank of America.

Congratulations on your win Attorney Gary Lane.

Gary Lane Vs. Stuart Price Lawsuit

Court of Appeal Decision

Update added on 04/27/12 11:59 pm (pacific):

A blogger left the following comment:

“le sigh”….John-this story is all wrong. Gary Lane dismissed his action against Price right before the Motion To Strike was heard. When he filed his appeal, he didn’t pay the filing fee. He received a default notice and then he paid. The court reinstated his appeal. Period. No victory, to ruling in his favor.

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=43&doc_id=2009409&doc_no=G046693

That will be $350 please. Didn’t you learn from (Name Redacted)? You don’t know Gary Lane any more than you really knew (Name Redacted).

John Wright responds: Fair enough and good point.

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can.

I need it more than ever right now.

April 26th, 2012

I am receipt of a wonderful gift from Piggybankblogger Jerome Kern. It seems that he has a great sense of humor too, because he had told me ahead of time that he would be sending me a picture of who it was that I had been chatting with all this time — along with a gift that he said he would be sending me. The picture that was pasted on the front of the Fedex package was of some big scary dude who looked like he just got out of prison or something. No it was not Mitchell J. Stein — but instead it was a picture of a big scary thug like looking guy. He was far too honest looking to look like Mitchell. It certainly looked like not anyone that I would ever want to have problems with. This is why it kind of made me scratch my head while wondering if I really ever knew who I was talking to on the other end all this time. Then when I opened up the package the real picture of Jerome and son fell out onto my desk. Wow! What a relief! His son looked like he must be about five years old — and it was a great picture of them both sitting on Jerome’s badass motorcycle. It actually reminded me of an exact picture of me and my dad sitting on his motorcycle when I was around the same age.

Attached was a letter from Jerome that said:

Happy But Late April Fools. You never know who you are talking to these days buddy. I wanted you to know that I value our friendship.”

You totally fooled me with that picture Jerome! (lol)

Jerome also sent me a beautiful large wall size picture of a massive old time sailing ship with multiple sails — but not to be mistaken as the multiple trusts and beneficiaries that exist in my title and securitization report with the loan that Bank of Defrauding America illegitimately states they own. This is even though this was probably also just a picture of the original. (Wink) And thank God it was not a picture of Mitchell J. Stein in his muscle shirt or something! I mean Puke! No way! Even if I was a girl he would have to pay me! No pun intended.

At any rate, this massive ship seemed to be fighting the stormy seas coming out of the picture right towards me. It was super cool! I loved it! It had this baby blue background with a stormy looking sky behind it. It also had a really fancy frame too. Jerome said in his letter that the picture was in his attic since 1977. He said that it must have been waiting to be sent to me — and I agree! Let me tell you why. Last weekend I passed by this one wall in my house while thinking to myself that there needed to be some kind of picture there. I was not sure what picture should go there after nine years of living here — but it sure seemed that something was missing in that spot. I just could not figure out what picture it was. So I just hammered a nail in that spot for whatever picture I was going to put there in the future. Then yesterday I hung the picture of the ship Jerome sent me on that very nail. Then it all seemed to make sense. It filled the space perfectly blending into the colors of the wall behind it. I love it! The ship represents to me Jerome coming to Piggybankblog.com with his struggle with Bank of Hurting America and The Great Mortgage Crisis everytime I look at it now. That is when I wondered what ship would symbolize each and every one of you and your struggle with Bank of Trying to Steal your American Dream. That’s why I am actually inviting each and every one of you to all search for a picture of a ship on the internet that best explains your character and struggle right now. For example, if you were Stein — you might simply send me a picture of a sunk ship sitting at the bottom of the sea.

That’s okay though. That is because I am sure he can just maybe continue to live off his wife.

Now be sure to send me the picture of your ship to my email once you find it. This is because I might be making a youtube in the future representing each and every single one of your struggle with Bank of Destroying Our American Dream.

Now just in case someof you out there do not already know — Jerome was actually making reference to the ships that the Navajo Indian Medicine Man from New Mexico told me would be coming my way “In The Day of The Great Storm” nearly 22 years ago.

Indian Medicine Man said:

“In the day of the great storm there shall be many mighty ships, as well as the Chiefs who drive them. These ships have been built for storms, but this storm shall be an unusually strong one, as they will realize that this storm shall be worse than the storms previous. During this time, the angry waves of the sea shall consume both the large and the small vessel, but there shall be many that will remain. The chiefs of the remaining ships shall become tired, confused, scared and exhausted, because they are ships with no set course, as they will not know where to turn for safety. They shall want to give up at some point, but just before they do, they shall see a small pin point of light off in the distance. While fighting the angry sea, they shall turn their mighty ships towards that small light.”

The Medicine Man stopped talking at this point. He then turned and looked at me but remained silent. I did not understand the meaning of the vision he had just told me. However, I was curious to what that light was the chief of these ships were heading towards.

John Wright: “What was the light they were heading towards?”

Indian Medicine Man: ”In the day of the great storm — you shall write with a pen that has no ink. Whatever you shall write will be that light.”

The Indian Medicine Man Foretold It All 22 Years Ago

The Medicine Man had told me all this when I was 18 years old. He explained to me that there was a curse put on the white man’s government for taking their sacred land from them. He said that is why those under the white man’s government would lose their land by being tricked in the same way in The Day of the Great Storm. Now at that time I really could not understand the meaning of all this he said to me such as: “The Great Storm” or “The Ships” or “The Chiefs of these ships” or “A Pen With No Ink.” I simply thought they were the ramblings of an old fool at the age of 18. That is why it is hard to believe that it has taken me nearly 22 years to realize the meaning of the vision that he had seen. I now understand that the “ships” he was talking about coming to me would be in reference to all of you. He must have been talking about your physical body and physical things you have – such as your homes and physical investment. Then when he said “The Chiefs of these ships” he must have been referring to your souls that drive your physical body and want to keep your homes. The “pen without ink” is really self-explanatory now but it was not then. This is because there were no computers with keyboards then. It is readily apparent that he might have making reference to the very keyboard that I am writing to you from at this very moment.

Now I remember that when I showed him to the door when he was leaving — that there was this one last moment that he turned around and looked into my eyes and slowly put a small smile on his face. He then slowly had taken his right hand and lightly patted my face looking into my eyes with a smile when said to me: “Clever boy.” He then winked at me and turned around and left.

It has been said that the windows into ones soul is their eyes. Now being somewhat of an intuitive myself I did not have to look into the Medicine Mans eyes to hear the rhythm of the song his ancestors were singing to me. He apparently knew this about me too — because that is what brought him to me instead of me to him. Yet the reason for me and him meeting might only be better understood by us Medicine Men.

But the song and rhythm of my heart has always been similar to his and his ancestors.

I have never seen or talked to the Navajo Indian Medicine man ever again since that day.

And yet he still speaks to me in spirit even as I write to you now.

Don’t forget to send me a picture of your ship!

.
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!

.
Please donate if you can. I need it more than ever right now.
.

April 25th, 2012

I am sorry that I have not been able to get back to some of your emails that many of you have sent to me over the past two weeks. Truth is that I have fallen behind in responding due to the other obligations that I have. Sometimes I just take a break for a little bit to rest. This is because I put so much of myself into each email that I answer that I have to take some time off to recharge my spiritual batteries. Yet I will be spending most of today answering these emails. So expect to hear from me today if you have written me.

Now even though I had a falling-out with (Name of Company Redacted) — it does mean that I do not believe in the title and securitization report being done. This is because you all know that I have believed in having one done even before I met (Name of Company Redacted) The only thing this falling- out means is that I now need to find another company that I can refer you to instead of (Name of Company Redacted) because I do not believe in them anymore. This referral will of course not solely depend on if they advertise with me here at Piggybankblog.com though, but will actually depend on if I feel that they are a competent company offering quality and expert reports and quality affidavits at a “resonable price.” If they want to advertise I will of course post banners and announce that I am being paid by the advertiser. Otherwise I will just refer people to a good company without being paid advertising on my site because I still think it is that important to have done. Now I already know that Brookstone Law uses a pretty good service, however, I want to see if I can find maybe three other services that I can offer you at the same time so nobody claims I am working for Brookstone. (yawn) This way you can have several options to choose from – other than just one. Now if any of you already know of some good services please do not hesitate to let me know about them. This way I can research them for my supporters here at Piggybankblog — and make an educated decision on which one we should refer people to here. We can figure this out together. Yet I am sure we can all agree now that I now have the experience of knowing what to look for — or should I say NOT LOOK FOR – after you consider my negative experience with (Name of Company Redacted)For example, I will be looking for one that has some young guy doing reports that have been found to be “above average but not unique” while at the same time having his words on the internet admitting that he lied in the past because he was young and ambitious about maybe making money. – blog posting This is because now I know it is important to have Creditable Expert Witness Testimony by maybe someone who actually used to trade these mortgages backed securities loans for a living. This is because I have concluded that it is important that a high caliber expert review the report results and represent them in an affidavit for the court. Otherwise it could have disastrous consequences, such as in the case of this (Name Redacted) customer that had his affidavit done by (Name Redacted). – who I like to call “Boy Wonder.”

Pissed Off Customer

04/12/12

I knew you had some business arrangement with (Name Redacted). Both of you fed me bullshit and danced around the question when I asked.

It’s all about the dollars, misrepresenting just like the BOA.

I hired them as a result of you marketing them. They turned out to be novices, at best. Everyone in the Court nearly laughed out loud when I presented (Name Redacted) Affidavit. –

Unfortunately, if you believe in their product, I don’t believe in you.

Faddie is a kid…I looked him up and found pictures of him partying and what not. He looks like he could even be in college

This was completely unacceptable after you consider that we all tried to warn (Name Redacted) that this is exactly what would happen if he did not consider the fact that he was potentially not experienced enough at 22 years old to produce an affidavit that the court would consider credible. We all tried to warn him but he would not listen. This would be a perfect example of that saying that says - “Those of them who think they know it all really annoy those of who really do.” Yet I have to admit that I do not think I have met a 22 year old who does not think he knows it all. This might mean that (Name Redacted) is “above average but not unique.” (wink) At any rate, I think the point is that the affidavit (Name Redacted) gave above could have potentially damaged and hurt the person’s case rather than help it. This is exactly why I cannot suggest that people go to (Name of Company Redacted) anymore. For the record, I have information that might suggest that (Name Redacted) has received help from Attorney Eric W. or Attorney Stein on a new affidavit to produce for the court — as if that is going to make any of us here feel better now.

It is important to mention that my feelings about (Name of Company Redacted) does not mean that I hope they go out of business. In fact my feelings are actually quite the opposite. This is because I just want them to make the improvements that are needed to make them a successful title and securitization search company that can help homowners maybe win their lawsuits without making them a potential victim. This is because — at the end of the day — it is not us or me against (Name of Company Redacted) it is us against the banks and their fraudulent ways. That is why this blogger actually welcomes as many quality title and securitization report companies to be available on the market that can assist the homeowners in their fight to keep their homes. It is also why I wish (Name of Company Redacted) nothing but the best in all of their endeavors for the future. My protest is an expression of my freedom of speech which is meant to influence them to maybe make the positive changes that do not result in something like the complaint by the (Name of Company Redacted) customer above. For the record, it has never been and never will be my intention to put them out of business. That is also not my intention here with even Bank of America. It is a protest to make them want to be better in a way that does not create victims. This is why I might consider either updating or completely ending my protest against National Mortgage Investigation if they do the right thing. This is regardless to if they pay me the money they owe me or not, which incidently, I had sent (Name Redacted) an email telling him that I would be protesting even if he did pay me. Now that kind of blows the whole “extortion for money” theory out of the water. Yet I assure you that I will NEVER be referring anyone to them during the days that I think they are having dealings with one of the most potentially corrupt attorneys we have ever seen or been a victim of here in California. This is because he is usually up to no good wherever he goes.

With that being said, I have been offered by several investors the opportunity to start my own title and securitization report company. This is because they only trust me and my experience and integrity, and not someone who has a history of lying in his past like (Name Redacted) does. It is also because I have the ability to bring experts who actually traded these loans on Wall Street to whatever team I put together. Yet I told them that I would have to think about it. This is because I do not want it taking too much or any time away from my protest against Bank of Defrauding America. However, if I am able to conclude that it is in the best interest of the public — I will certainly do it for you. It might prove to be the only way that I can be sure that my supporters and the homeowners are able to get a high quality title and securitization report done. Once again, it would not be done to put (Name of Company Redacted) out of business. It will be done because I believe competition is a healthy way to actually make other companies strive to be better and, therefore, is in the publics best interest.

Now even though I do not believe in (Name of Company Redacted) anymore — it should not be taken as to mean that I do not believe that the issue of Bank of America having unidentified multiple investors and multiple trusts and multiple beneficiaries does not exist. For example, my report shows BANK OF AMERICA DOES NOT OWN MY LOAN. In my case — I have heard from a real expert who used to actually trade mortgage backed security for Goldman Sachs on Wall Street –and not from some guy still only old enough to trade baseball cards in the playground. That means that my report is pretty straight forward. This means that Stuart Price and Bank of Foolilng The Feds will not be able to prove otherwise once in court.

Therefore, I will soon be filing an “individual lawsuit” against Bank of America for the thrid time. It will be appropriately titled the “Wright vs. Bank of America” lawsuit. This will be in addition to the mass joinder that I am already in with many of you titled the “Wright et al vs. Bank of America lawsuit.” This is because I might be one of the most nortorious victims of Bank of America’s potentially irregular, fraudulent, unsafe, abusive and simply illegal mortgage stealing practices. The simple fact is that I am doing this not because I am looking for a free house.

I am doing this to make sure that Bank of Stealing America does not get a free house.

Lawsuit announcement:

………….(Please disregard part in youtube that said it will be this week.)

This why we will never give in! We will never give up! And we will never hate those who hate us! This is because in the day that we do — we will have simply known that our enemy has truly won. That is why you and I are simply the Champions of this cause to hold the banks accountable — and not Mitchell J. Stein or National Mortgage Investigation.

Click here for We Are The Champions And No Time For Losers song

I’ve taken my bows
And my curtain calls
You brought me fame and fortune and everything that goes with it
I thank you all
But it’s been no bed of roses
No pleasure cruise
I consider it a challenge before the whole human race
And I ain’t gonna lose!

Amen.

.
All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

Please donate if you can. I need it more than ever right now.
.

April 24th, 2012

Now I know that one or two of you feel that all I should talk about on my blog is Bank of Defrauding America and the banks. This is mainly because you feel that anything else has nothing to do with fighting the banks – but you are wrong. This is because it may not have anything to do with you fighting the banks, but it certainly has EVERYTHING to do with me fighting the banks. This is because I consider any potentially unethical law firm or title and search company making grossly false allegations about me with their lies a threat to my protest — if not to my credibility. Don’t you think the bank attorney grabs a hold of any of these false claims made by these unethical firms to try and exploit it while in court? Well I must respectfully disagree with you then — because I assure you that they do. That is why it has and it will remain as being considered the policy of this blogger and blog to consider any threat against me or my protest or the law firms or the attorneys representing me – as nothing other than an attack which will be considered as being part of fighting the banks. That is why I will continue to use my vast amount of resources and networking to TRACK DOWN and to IDENTIFY and to LOCATE and to EXPOSE EVERY SINGLE PERSON or UNETHICAL LAW FIRM or COMPANY INVOLVED IN A CONSPIRACY. This is because I have zero tolerance for anyone who dares to make any such attempt to disperse lies about me in a way meant to do damage to my name or protest in this manner. That is why I will hold each and every single person legally accountable and sociably accountable while I expose them before The Court of Public Opinion. Let the record show that I have a record of having a 100% accuracy rate identifying them in the past when I want to.

The other thing is that everyone should still remember that I have all sorts of readers who come from all walks of life with different interests – which means that majority rules if my tracker shows there is an interest in what topic I am writting about. For example, I receive a lot complaints on Mitchell J. Stein and Toby Butterworthless and Spire Law Group and Attorney Eric W. This means it is in the publics best interest for me to write about it. That is why the story will be told. Therefore — I could not disagree more that everyone does not want to hear about. This is because my tracking number results say different — which might imply that “One man’s junk is another man’s treasure.” This is especially true when it comes to the California Justice Department, California State Bar Association, Federal Bureau of Investigations, and even the United States Justice Department — who is always on my site looking for information on Mitchell J. Stein. Now do you think they run into some of the other stuff I write about the banks? Of course they do! In fact – I know they do. This is because I see them reading it all the time. Do you think they would be here if I was not writing about Mitchell J. Stein? Well, before you answer, I should let you know that it is his name they usually are typing into the search that brings them to my page. The other name they are starting to type in is (Name Redacted) because they might now be interested in the fact they might be hanging out with Stein.

Now if some potentially washed-up attorney can be considered “The Doberman” — then I am guessing that I could be more appropriately described as “The Pit Bull.” That is when you consider the lockjaw I tend to use on unethical law firms.

What is the difference between the Dobie and the Pit Bull?

Temperament of a Pit Bull:

Now if there was a manual describing ideal Pit Bull temperament, it would probably read something like this: “The Pit Bull is goofily friendly towards people – family, friends, and strangers alike. Known for its sound character, strong nerve, and great intelligence, the breed makes an ideal companion for households with children, while remaining strong and vigilant enough to protect its loved ones if need be. It is never necessary to embark on guard or attack training with this breed, as they are naturally attuned to their environment and intuitive about real threats. Although never aggression towards people without real need, the Pit Bull may show dog-directed aggression, but sensitivity to other dogs will vary from dog to dog. The properly socialized and trained Pit Bull should not be an instigator, yet it is unlikely for the breed to shy away from a challenge.

Today the Pit Bull has evolved into a marvelous working and companion dog, used for purposes as varied as those it originally performed. Pit Bulls are employed as police/armed services dogs, search and rescuers, therapy animals, and livestock workers. They compete in all manner of organized dog sports, from herding to agility to conformation to obedience and the bite sports like Schutzhund and French Ring. They make loving pets for children and seniors, and everyone in between. They are indeed one of the most versatile breeds on the planet. Much of this is owed to the activities it once performed. The harshness and physical demands of the activities molded a strong, healthy, stable animal, one anyone should be proud to own.

They are known for their intelligence and loyalty. American Pit Bull Terriers make excellent, loving and protective companions despite the unfair press they receive. - source

Temperament of a Doberman:

If you can not view youtube where you are at – click here

Here are some solutions for your Doberman if you have this problem:

Spay/Neuter your Doberman

This helps prevent surprises and overpopulation. If done early enough, it also helps prevent the emergence of dominance or aggression based behavior problems (if the behaviors have already emerged then training will be needed to correct them). Make sure that you have set and are consistently enforcing the household rules. Establish yourself as the pack leader (tips here) so that he will follow your commands. Make sure your dog knows the “Leave It Command.” Any time he starts the behavior or appears to be thinking of doing it, instruct him to Leave it. Use a firm tone. If he ignores your commands, try using a water bottle to squirt him with whenever he starts the humping.

Now this below is for Piggybankblogger Renoria:

Judges Helping Bank Lawyers at Foreclosure Trials

Posted on April 21st, 2012 by Mark Stopa

A prospective client just sent me this transcript from a trial she handled herself. Although she lost, this homeowner did a decent job. She didn’t assert any objections, some of which certainly would have been appropriate, and I think she’d be the first to admit it would have been much better if she had a lawyer. We all know lawyers can do better than pro se homeowners, though, so I don’t want to harp on that.

Instead, I want to discuss something that really jumped out at me as I read the transcript. Unfortunately, I fear this will be a significant issue in many foreclosure cases as more trials take place, and it’s something about which everyone should be aware.

Read the transcript. Do you notice how the judge was helping the bank’s lawyer?

You might think it was subtle, but, as I see it, the judge’s “help” absolutely jumped off the page.

Look at page 8. The bank’s lawyer made it clear he had “no further questions” (for the only witness he brought to trial), and it was clear to me that he was done presenting evidence. However, the bank’s counsel had not asked his (only) witness any questions or introduced any evidence to prove the bank’s claim to re-establish the lost note, as would be required for the bank to prevail and foreclose. Clearly, the judge realized counsel was not introducing evidence of an essential part of his case. But instead of allowing him to screw up (and, potentially, enter judgment for the homeowner), the judge interjected:

“[Counsel], this is a lost note?”

If you’re a nonlawyer, this might seem subtle, but as a lawyer, I assure you – this was an obvious reminder by the judge that the bank’s attorney needed to submit additional evidence. Of course, right on cue, the lawyer responded by asking more questions, with an eye towards proving what a bank needs to prove to re-establish a lost note under Florida Statute 673.3091.

Tellingly, at the bottom of page 8 and continuing at the top of page 9, the bank’s lawyer actually asked the judge if she “required anything else.” This was not innocuous, either; this was the lawyer’s way of asking the judge, on the record, if he was missing any other evidence necessary to prove his case (and for the bank to prevail). In response, the judge told him precisely what to ask:

“no explanation as to how [the note] got lost?!

Again, right on cue, the bank’s attorney responded by asking the question the judge told him to ask, i.e. how the note was lost.

Later (on pages 44-45), after all the evidence was admitted and the bank’s lawyer and this homeowner were making closing arguments, the homeowner argued the case should be dismissed given the bank’s failure to give her the required 30-day notice and opportunity to cure. The bank’s lawyer didn’t think this letter was necessary, but the judge prompted him to re-open his case to introduce the letter into evidence, asking him:

“Do you wish to re-open the case to admit the letter?”

Notably, the bank’s attorney had not asked to re-open the case; the judge suggested, all on her own, that he do so.

That’s three instances where this judge prompted the bank’s lawyer to do something to prove his case. The judge prompted counsel to ask questions about a lost note, directed him to ask for an explanation of how the note was lost, and encouraged him to re-open the evidence to introduce the lost note.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is completely, undoubtedly, 100% wrong. And that’s not just my opinion – that’s what many, many Florida appellate decisions have held. Judges cannot help bank lawyers prove their cases at foreclosure trials. This judge did, three times, in fact, but that conduct never should have happened.

I hate to compare foreclosure trials to criminal case, but, frankly, criminal cases is where this type of fact-pattern often arises. Sometimes, when a prosecutor forgets to ask an important question or introduce a key piece of evidence, the judge (wanting to see the criminal defendant get convicted) will feel compelled to suggest a question or remind the prosecutor to introduce certain evidence. This is plainly not permitted. Quite simply, a judge is not allowed to give “tips” or “hints” to a plaintiff’s attorney, at trial, to help the attorney prove the plaintiff’s case. In fact, a judge’s conduct in this regard requires that a motion to disqualify the judge be granted. See Blackpool Assocs., Ltd. v. SM-106, Ltd., 839 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Evans v. State, 831 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Lee v. State, 789 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), Asbury v. State, 765 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Chastine v. Broome, 629 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“When the judge enters into the proceedings and becomes a participant, a shadow is cast upon judicial neutrality so that disqualification is required.”) .

In Lee, for instance, the judge suggested to the prosecutor that he have a witness identify the defendant’s tattoos. In Evans, the judge suggested that the prosecutor inquire about the defendant’s immigration status after she testified she was a law-abiding citizen. In both cases, the appellate court reversed criminal convictions, concluding the judge should not have “helped” the prosecution.

Unfortunately, some judges view foreclosure cases in much the same way as criminal trials. Many such judges want to see foreclosure judgments entered, so they feel compelled to give “hints” or “suggestions” to bank attorneys on how to proceed (rather than letting those lawyers screw up and cause a favorable result for a homeowner). In my view, that’s exactly what we saw in this transcript, above. The judge wanted the bank to prevail, so she was giving hints to counsel on how to proceed.

If it sounds like I’m being critical, I’m not trying to be. It’s human nature to “help” someone who is struggling or forgetful. In a sense, I can understand how judges would feel a natural instinct to give suggestions to counsel on what to do – it’s human nature to help people.

That said, judges must resist this urge. Giving advice like this during a trial is not appropriate. For anyone defending a foreclosure trial, it is very important not to allow a judge to do this (and to point it out to the judge if he/she does so). I realize you can’t control what the judge says or does, but if this happens … OBJECT!!! Tell the judge:

“Respectfully, Judge, I don’t think it is fair or appropriate for you to be suggesting to plaintiff’s counsel what questions or ask or what evidence to present.”

Likewise, if a bank’s attorney asks a judge, during trial, ”do you need anything else,” the appropriate response from the judge is “counselor, it’s not my role to tell you if you’ve submitted sufficient evidence to prove your case.”

I encountered this very dynamic in my foreclosure trial last week. At various points, the bank’s attorney wasn’t sure how to proceed, and the judge started giving him hints, suggesting areas of inquiry and giving advice on how to proceed. The first two times, I interjected, forcefully but respectfully, telling the judge it was inappropriate for him to be giving advice to plaintiff’s counsel. The third time, I was more aggressive, moving to disqualify the judge. Although the judge denied that motion, he did not give any more hints to plaintiff’s counsel, and without the judge helping him, the bank’s attorney wasn’t sure how to proceed. Ultimately, this uncertainty left counsel unable to prove his case, forcing him to dismiss it.

After the trial, the judge joked with me that I was a “pain in the ass,” but told me I was right by asserting these objections. In his words, the judge knew he couldn’t ”carry” the bank’s lawyer any more. I’m not saying the judge liked it (hence the “pain in the ass” comment), but when push came to shove, and when I called him out on it, the judge realized he couldn’t help the bank’s attorney.

Everyone needs to be aware of this issue. Judges can’t give hints to counsel, and if they do, then we all need to, respectfully but forcefully, make it clear that we are objecting to any and all such “hints.”

Why is this so important? Well, bear in mind … a huge aspect of foreclosure defense is forcing plaintiffs’ attorneys to prove their case. It’s the responsibility of the bank’s attorney to prove that case (not the judge), both by asking the right questions and introducing all of the required evidence. Then, at the end of trial, it’s the judge’s job to evaluate whether the evidence is sufficient for the bank to foreclose, and, if it’s not, to rule in the homeowner’s case. In other words, the judge is there to evaluate the evidence, not to make sure the bank submits evidence.

By the way, I’m inclined to take an appeal on behalf of the homeowner who handled that trial herself, for two reasons. One is a pretty glaring hole in the evidence (which I’ll keep to myself to avoid helping any nosy bank lawyers who may be reading this) and the second is, yes, how inappropriate it was for the judge to keep helping the bank’s attorney.

Mark Stopa

http://www.stayinmyhome.com

.
I’m tired. I am going back to bed.

All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

Please donate if you can. I need it more than ever right now.
.

April 23rd, 2012

I received a call from a candidate that is running for office for State Representative in one of the states. He has been trying to talk me into running his online campaign in a separate blog for some time now. Yet I told him that I might be too busy trying to protect the public and (Name Redacted) from a certain attorney out here. Then I agreed to do it — because I realized something, which is that I realized that this attorney might be going to prison in October anyway. Yes – it is true — Satan has been cast down to you in great anger — knowing that he only has a short time to get Brookstone Law back while trying to win a war he has already lost. What a loser! Then again — his time might end up being shorter than he thinks. That is if he breaks anymore laws or tries to do harm to me and my protest. (Wink) This is because faster his end shall come than his beginning (Dramatic License Used) — if he even so much as comes close to threatening me or my protest or what I do here. This is because — the last time I checked — this attorney is out on bond. That means that I will not even hesitate to pick up the phone and call the feds if he tries to hurt me or my protest while being part of a potential conspiracy. That is why we have a saying in my family: “You don’t fuck with Chuck.” (Dramatic license) That is because I promise you that he will not pass go and collect 200 dollars on the board if I have to do that. Nevertheless, that is why I think it would be absolutely hilarious if he ended up breaking the terms of his bond and having to go to jail right now. This is because the poor bastard asked for an extension for his trial from March 1st to October 1st — which means that Satan would have to sit in jail for the entire time of the extension he requested. He would have finally done it to himself! (lol) And in that day — I will giggle my little fucking ass off if I find out that he was trying to hurt me and piggybankblog behind the scenes. This is because I have heard that evidence came back that there is a certain attorney that has secretly contacted (Name Redacted) – while offering him help behind the scenes to hurt me and a few other people that this attorney seems to have some kind of vendetta against.

So it looks like “The Sith” might have found himself a new “Darth Vader.”

I hope that (Name Redacted) is spiritually strong. This is because this attorney can control a 22 year old’s mind in a flat second — as I have seen him bring grown men to their knees crying snot bubbles from what he has put them through. He has read him like book by now — and he knows all his wants and needs and fears and desires. And — if there is one little bit of greed in him — he will consume him — and take him to hell with him before he even knew what happened to him. You see — that is why I survived it. This is because there was not one ounce of greed or bad or hate found in my heart. Now he might hate me for that. Yet I don’t care what he likes or hates. I just want him to stay as far away from me as possible. This is because I am not interested in fighting him back at all. That is not what I am here for. That does not mean, however, that I will not fight back if I have to. (wink)

By now I bet you that this attorney has already told (Name Redacted) how smart and beyond his years he is. This is because that is exactly what a 22 year old (Name Redacted) might want to hear. Yet — if he was smart — he would run as fast as he can away from this attorney before he ruins his life. I am sure it might have made (Name Redacted) simply moist when this attorney flatters him with his bullshit — but it is bullshit. This is because the Devil knows that flattery will go a long ways with many — even if it does not go anywhere with me when talking to the Devil. For example, I remember this attorney was always telling me what an extraordinary talent I was. It was to the point of being an exaggerated expression. That is when I started laughing when I hung up the phone because I thought to myself – “Golly Gee Willikers! I feel like he is going to offer me some candy before he starts touching my privates. Really? I am pretty?” Whatever Satan! Get behind me!

So has this attorney pulled the “Diane Feinstein trick” on anyone here yet? (lol) This involves him transferring to the other line for a minute — then when he comes back on he says – “Oh that was just Diane Feinstein. Sorry about that.” Bullshit Alert! Bullshit Alert! He wishes! The reason I am asking you — is because someone called me right after talking to him and asked me. I could not believe it! They called it! Not more than five minutes before he was doing it with me on the phone. (lol) I fell for it hook line and sinker. I mean — who does that? (lol) I think he does it because he wants you to think he is connected or something — but is definitely the blueprint of him trying to get control of your mind. Then he makes it where you depend on him. He might even file a free bogus lawsuit for you or something — but it is not to win — it might be only so that he can have control of you. The lawsuit usually has no substance to it. Trust me! I know! And let me tell ya — if you are not strong like me — he will have you clucking like a chicken before you even know what happened to you. — clucking like a chicken

At anyr rate, I would not be surprised if this attorney has made (Name Redacted) all sorts of false promises that he is going to bring investors for National Mortgage investigation – while he might be telling him that he will use his report for whatever firm he thinks he still has — but just potentially to get control over him so he can get him to lie. Oh yah – you bet — Satan is whispering into (Name Redacted) ear right now — and it is the same whisper that whispered into Cain’s ear to kill his brother in the bible. In a like manner — I am sure Satan told (Name Redacted) lies about me — just to get him to do his bidding. This is because we all know how he works — but poor (Name Redacted) is the new kid on the block — or should I say “new victim.” In fact — I bet you that this attorney has even lied to (Name Redacted) by telling him I am paid by Brookstone Law to do my blog. Those cheap bastards! (kidding) Please! They would never pay me! (lol) And neither would I let them! Yet I bet you that he is even lying that he paid me to do my blog when I was his client. Trust me — I have plenty of emails telling this attorney to fuck off whenever he tried to insinuate such a thing. The simple fact is that I am no attorney or law firms bitch. For the record, the only time I was ever paid to do anything on my blog was by National Mortgage Investigation — which incidentally — did not pay me all the money they owed me. The fact is that I was simply too smart to NOT KNOW this attorney was absolutely toxic to have anything to do with — and I hope young (Name Redacted) realizes this too. Because truth be told — I don’t hate the kid or want anything bad to happen to him. The simple fact is that this attorney might be the type of attorney or guy that would ask you please carry his bags on to the plane for him – but only to find out they were full of drugs or something. Evil has no boundaries — and it does not care about its victims. If Satan was not convincing — he would not have so many victims. But we care about his victims. So please — save us all from him California Attorney General Harris! I was wrong! You were right about him! And I am sorry I ever protested againt her — because now I get it. Therefore, I support California Attorney General and the California State Bar’s actions. Lock him up!

In my opinion, he is using (Name Redacted). He is trying to condition him. He tried to condition me but it did not work. He simply could not control me. That is why they don’t try to draft people our age in the military. For example, they tell us to do push ups – and we tell them to go fuck themselves at our age. I have to admit though — I was completely fascinated by the fact that he knew the craft to the level that he did. This is because I have not met many who do. Yet I noticed he only knows part of it. What I mean is — he has to use the same blueprint every time. I stuck around just long enough to study him. This attorney never could figure me out though. All this time — and he still has not figured out who I am yet. We have met before. He just does not remember. But I know who he is — which is why I know he has no intention of delivering to (Name Redacted) what he is promising him. I watched it happen time and time again with the others. (Name Redacted) will not be happy when he is done using him. This is because it will be the worst day of his life. Yet — I guess he will just have to wait and see that I am right. And in that day — he will remember my words of warning.

Therefore, let he who have an ear — let him hear. This attorney was a master at his craft. It was what made him a good attorney in the courtroom — but an asshole in the real world. Yet I am also a master at my craft too. This is because while he was studying me — well — I was simply studying him. That is why he should know that I am very well versed on the art of the craft — but not on the art of the dark side. This is because the only difference is that I use my powers for good and not for bad. The good shall always prevail — but it is almost like a fight between “The Sith” and “Obi Wan Kenobi” from the movie Star Wars or something. If true – (Name Redacted) might be “Anikin” from the “Revenge of the Sith episode” – which would make John Wright “Obi Wan Kenobi” preparing to fight the young deceived and lied to “Anikan.”

“I will do what I must.”

Young Anikan said: “You underestimate my power.”

(You can see it in Youtube starting at 6:20 – but watch it from 5:32)

How ironic it would be close to what young (Name Redacted) threantend me with:

“Nothing will be as interesting as the blog posting we are going to write on Tuesday though. You forget- I have the ability to spend more $ on marketing anything I want than you will ever have. Once again- underestimating me. You thought I was a kid, you thought. And you thought wrong. Wright is wrong again. (laughing) (wink wink).” - (Name Redacted)

Too bad he had help with those words. You see — I recognize them. Yet I wonder who “we” is? (Smirk) I can smell the sulfur of Satan wherever he goes — and he knows it. (Wink)

In the end – I will remember that there was a time that Michael The Great Arch Angel had a dispute with Satan over where Moses’ body was going to be buried. For the record, Michael did not bring Satan into abusive terms the entire time.

He simply said – ‘May God rebuke you Satan.’

The Devil Came Down From Florida instead of Georgia

Now may the force be with all of you reading this today.

.
All Rise! The Honorable Judge John Wright has left The Courtroom of Public Opinion!
My name is John Wright AND I AM FIGHTING BACK!

Please donate if you can. I need it more than ever right now.
.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Click here to cancel reply.

Author: Piggybankblog

visit my website

San Francisco Audit Uncovers Extensive Flaws in Foreclosures

President Obama Warns Banks In State of The Union Address

There Is No Turning Back If You Pick The Red Pill To Enter John’s Dai...

Updates – Wright et al vs. BofA